Adding Clinical Data to Administrative Datasets: Overview of AHRQ Pilots
Roxanne Andrews, Anne Elixhauser
13th Annual Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Partners Meeting
November 18, 2009
Limitations of Administrative Data for Quality Measurement
- Lacks clinically important information
- Limited to ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes
- Missing physiological data (lab values and vital signs)
- May not include present on admission (POA) indicator for diagnoses
- POA distinguishes conditions at admission (comorbidities) from conditions that arose during a stay (complications)
AHRQ's Adding Clinical Data Project
- Purpose:
- Establish the feasibility of linking clinical and administrative data
- Develop a reproducible approach for joining clinical and administrative data
- Enhance capabilities of state data organizations
- Set the stage for future integration of clinical and administrative data streams
Two Types of Contracts
In-depth Pilots
- Add or link hospital clinical information to administrative data
- September 2007 - September 2009
Planning Contract
- Not ready for pilot but want to investigate linkage
- September 2007 - March 2009
Awards to Statewide Data Organizations
Pilots
- Florida Agency for Health Care Administration
- Minnesota Hospital Association (MHA)
- Virginia Health Information(VHI)
Planning
- Washington Center for Health Statistics, State Department of Health
AHRQ Adding Clinical Data Pilot & Planning Awards
Map of the United States. Florida, Minnesota, and Virginia are highlighted as pilot states. Washington is highlighted as a planning state.
Project Requirements
- Identify and select clinical data elements
- Add POA if not already collected
- Extract clinical data from electronic format
- Transfer data from at least 5 hospitals
- Link clinical and administrative data
- Create a multi-hospital database
- Collaborate with stakeholders
Peer-to-Peer Learning Network
- Monthly conference calls
- Supported by Thomson-Reuters and NASHP
- Included California staff working on regs
- Annual in-person meet
- Purpose:
- Learn from and collaborate with peers
- Understand, anticipate, and resolve implementation hurdles
- Forge solutions for other data organizations
- Share tools and materials
Pilot Project Activities
- Developed project informational mat
- Recruited hospitals
- Identified clinical data elements to add
- Standardized lab data using Logical Observation Identifiers Names
and Codes (LOINC)
- Provided education and feedback on quality of POA coding
- Developed processes for data transmission, lab coding, data collection, and linking
- Provided technical assistance to hospitals
Project Successes
Project |
Number of Hospitals Expected |
Clinically-Enhanced Data Elements |
Contract Requirement |
5 |
POA (if not currently collecting) and others |
Florida |
22 |
34 lab values |
Minnesota |
13 |
POA, 26 selected numerical chemistry, blood gas, hematology lab results |
Virginia |
27 |
POA, approximately 30 lab values, several linking variables |
Challenges and Lessons Learned
- Project initiation
- Data standards and transmission
- Communication
- Data analysis
Next Steps for Pilot Organizations
- Continue analyzing data
- Develop reports and materials for volunteer hospitals
- Identify staffing, time, and funding needed for continuation of collection and analysis (sustainability)
Next Steps for AHRQ
- Disseminate information about the pilots
- Develop online toolkit based on the pilots' expereinces
- Obtain Partner input at lunch today
- Obtain Partner input through an information-gathering conference call
- Create materials and templates for Partners
Some Suggested Next Steps for AHRQ
- Develop materials on the business case for adding clinical data
- Estimate potential costs of adding clinical data
- Facilitate Partner education on LOINC
- Host vendor roundtable on LOINC
What suggestions do you have?