slide 1
Collection and Use of Race and Ethnicity Data for Discharge Data Reporting Systems: The New Mexico Race/Ethnicity Data Project
State of New Mexico Department of Health logo
Noell Stone, MPH
Nicole Katz, MPH
July 12, 2012
AHRQ R01 HS20033-01
slide 2
Team Members
Epidemiology and Response Division New Mexico Department of Health
Funder: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
slide 3
Purpose
To improve the collection of Race/Ethnicity/Tribal Identification data collected by hospitals
slide 4
New Mexico Population
2,059,179 people resided in New Mexico during 2010
Pie chart. New Mexico Race Demographics from 2010 Census. White 68%; American Indian/Alaskan Native 10%; Black 2%; Asian/Pacific Islander 1%; Other 15%; Multiple race 4%.
Pie chart. New Mexico Ethnicity Demographics from 2010 Census. Hispanic 46%; Non-Hispanic White 54%.
slide 5
Hospital Inpatient Discharge Database (HIDD)
slide 6
Outline
slide 7
What are the guidelines for data collection?
slide 8
Gold Standard for Data Collection by OMB 1997 Guidelines
slide 9
NMAC - Data reporting requirements for healthcare facilities
Q1: Ethnicity
E1-Hispanic /Latino
E2- Not Hispanic/Latino
E6- Declined*
E7- Unknown*
Q2:Race
R1-American Indian/Alaska Native
R2-Asian
R3-Black or African American
R4-Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
R5-White
R7-Unknown*
R9-Other Race*
Q3:Tribal Affiliation
T1-Acoma Pueblo
T2-Cochiti Pueblo
T3-Isleta Pueblo
T4-Jemez Pueblo
T5-Jicarilla Apache Nation
T6-Kewa/Santo Domingo Pueblo
T7-Laguna Pueblo
T8-Mescalero Apache Nation
T9-Nambe Pueblo
T10-Navajo Nation
T11-Ohkay Owingeh Pueblo
T12-Picuris Pueblo
T13-Pojoaque Pueblo
T14-San Felipe Pueblo
T15-San Ildefonso Pueblo
T16-Sandia Pueblo
T17-Santa Ana Pueblo
T18-Santa Clara Pueblo
T19-Taos Pueblo
T20-Tesuque Pueblo
T21-Zia Pueblo
T22-Zuni Pueblo
T100-Other Tribal Affiliation
T200-Declined
T300-Unknown
slide 10
How can we improve the collection of race/ethnicity/tribal affiliation data?
slide 11
Levels of Influence in Hospitals
Graphic Diagram showing the Health Information Systems Change Act as an example of influence on the federal and state legislation level; Regulation Change N M A C 7.1.4 as an example of influence on the policy and administration institution level; and hospital training, focus groups, site visits to hospitals, patient telephone surveys, and key informant interviews as examples of influence on the operational level (that is, at the level of data managers, IT systems, registration personnel, and patients).
slide 12
Path of Patient Data
Flow chart showing the following chronological steps: From Patient to Registration to Electronic Health Record to both I T /Data Manager and Billing, and from I T /Data Manager to D O H.
slide 13
Policy Change
slide 14
Hospital Training
slide 15
Training Evaluation
slide 16
How do we evaluate hospitals?
slide 17
New Mexico Race and Ethnicity Data Quarter One Report
DATES: January 1, 2011 - March 31, 2011
FACILITY NAME: SAMPLE
FILES RECEIVED: Yes
NUMBER OF RECORDS: 3119
QUARTER 1 RACE AND ETHNICITY VARIABLE EVALUATION:
PERCENT OF: | (%) | NUMBER OF: | (n) |
---|---|---|---|
Patients with Ethnicity Coding | 100.0 | Patients with Ethnicity Coding | 3119 |
Patients with Missing Ethnicity | 10.0 | Patients with Missing Ethnicity | 312 |
Patients with Unknown Ethnicity | 0 | Patients with Unknown Ethnicity | 0 |
Invalid Ethnicity Entries | 0.0 | Invalid Ethnicity Entries | 0 |
PERCENT OF: | (%) | NUMBER OF: | (n) |
Patients with Race Coding | 100.0 | Patients with Race Coding | 3119 |
Patients with Missing Race | 0.0 | Patients with Missing Race | 312 |
Patients with Unknown Race | 0 | Patients with Unknown Race | 0 |
Invalid Race Entries | 0.0 | Invalid Race Entries | 0 |
R1 (Native American) Patients with Tribal Affiliation | INVALID | R1 (Native American) Patients with Tribal Affiliation | INVALID |
COMMENTS:
QUESTIONS:
slide 18
Comparison of Inpatient Hospital Race and Ethnicity Demographics to County Level
Graphic - clockwise from upper left:
Pie chart. American Indian or Alaska Native 30%; Asian 20%; African American/Black 20%; Native Hawaiians or Pacific Islander 5%; White 10%; Other 5%; Two or more races 10%.
Pie chart. American Indian or Alaska Native 2%; Asian 0%; African American/Black 0%; Native Hawaiians or Pacific Islander 0%; White 84%; Other 11%; Two or more races 3%.
Pie chart. Hispanic 26%; Non-Hispanic 74%.
Pie chart. Hispanic 40%; Non-Hispanic 50%; Missing 10%.
slide 19
Patient Follow-Up Survey
slide 20
Focus Groups
slide 21
Proposed Data Linkages
slide 22
What are the common issues found in collecting, analyzing and reporting this data?
slide 23
COLLECTION
slide 24
Electronic Health Records
slide 25
Hospital Personnel
slide 26
ANALYZING
slide 27
Small Numbers Rule
slide 28
Denominator Issue
slide 29
REPORTING
slide 30
NM DOH Presentation of R/E Data
slide 31
NM DOH Vital Records Multiple Race Bridging Methods
Checked race | Code |
---|---|
Native Hawaiian | 06 |
American Indian or Native | 03 |
Black or African American | 02 |
Filipino | 08 |
Chinese | 04 |
Japanese | 05 |
Vietnamese | 12 |
Korean | 13 |
Asian Indian | 14 |
Guamanian or Chamorro | 15 |
Samoan | 16 |
Other Asian | 17 |
Other Pacific Islander | 18 |
Other | 07 |
White | 01 |
slide 32
Useful References
slide 33
Comments or Questions?
Contact Information:
Internet Citation: Patient Demographics Questionnaire-Staff Administered Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). July 2016. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/datainnovations/raceethnicitytoolkit/nm10.jsp. |
Are you having problems viewing or printing pages on this website? |
If you have comments, suggestions, and/or questions, please contact hcup@ahrq.gov. |
Privacy Notice, Viewers & Players |
Last modified 7/28/16 |